Understanding Fabian Socialism

A Fabian Socialist is one who deceptively advocates a Marxist society; who seeks to achieve reform gradually, rather than through revolutionary means, by using the capitalistic system to fulfill their ideology of “Greed-ism“! For the Fabians‘, exploiting other ideologies is a useful tool!

The difference between the Marxist and the Fabian is an important difference. From Marx’s point of view, socialism was going to be the answer to the capitalist economic system. Marx divided the human race into two groups, the proletariat and the bourgeois.

The bourgeois needed to be eliminated so that there could be peace on earth, and goodwill to all the socialists. In 1848 Marx and his followers from the Communist Manifesto looked upon private property as the origin of evil itself.

Fabians, instead of dividing the world between the two groups, decided that they were going to bring about socialism through a more peaceful process. Fabians decided that they were not going to use the heavy hand. They were going to go slowly and surely. Marxist socialism is revolutionistic, whereas Fabianism is evolutionistic.

Many people on the world scene today are Fabian Socialists. Barack Obama, Tony Blair (former Prime Minister of Great Britain), Gordon Brown (former Prime Minister of Great Britain) are all Fabian Socialist.

_*In the United States House of Representatives there are four progressive, radical, socialistic organizations or caucuses whose members are all Fabian Socialist*_; The Progressive Democrats of America, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Congressional Black Caucus, and the Democratic Socialists of America.

April 11, 2012 Allen West stated: “I believe there is about 78 to 81 members of the Democratic Party that are members of the Communist Party.”

The view of historical development which fit best with Anglo/American tradition has been a conception of individual rights independent of any theory of reciprocal obligations to the State; the duty of leaders is to Society, not to Government, a crucial distinction in perfect harmony with the teachings of Reformation Christianity, which extended to all believers a conception of individual duty, individual responsibility, and a free will right to decide for oneself beyond any claims of states

This has slowly been changed as those in government patiently push their socialist agenda down our throats. Unless We The People wake up and do something it will not be long before all property is owned by the government and our every move and thought will be dictated to us.

Understand this, the “redistribution” of wealth does not apply equally to all people. While we at the bottom are told where to live; where to work; and provided meager compensation that keeps us teetering on the edge of poverty, those in power, at the top, will enjoy freedom of movement; freedom of thought; choice where they live and compensation which can be called anything but meager!

Redistribution of wealth always has been and always will be at the expense and on the backs of the people!
This comment was left by Shannon Martin at UK Express


Read the article http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/735716/Italy-NEXT-to-reject-establishment-as-protest-vote-set-to-WIN-referendum-shock-poll-finds


Comment Category Tags