Remember when Susan Rice took to the Sunday news shows and told America repeatedly that the deaths of those heroes in Benghazi, Libya were due to an 'internet video' no one had ever seen?
The fact that everyone knew she was brazenly lying didn't seem to phase her at all. Think about that.
Well now Susan Rice is back and she's trying to convince America that there was nothing 'inappropriate' about their surveillance of Donald Trump and his associates during the 2016 election campaign.
The same surveillance she previously said had never occurred...
Blogger DWebster analyzed Susan Rice's latest attempt at pulling the wool over America's eyes, with her 'weasel words', in this comment DWebster left at TheHill.com. Check it out!Read more
Meanwhile, the media has demanded no proof about the Russia nonsense, for which no evidence has been produced after almost a year of fishing by the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign (one and the same).
It is clear what happened. The Obama administration used the Russia ruse as an excuse to conduct surveillance on the campaign of the opposing party's presidential candidate.Read more
I do not know what the facts are, yet. The facts that are apparent to me are the Media Assault on Trump, period.
1. Trump makes a seemingly unsubstantiated claim.
2. Trump refuses to back down on the claim (Usual for him)
3. Trump requests an investigation of his claims (NOT usual for him)
4. MSM and the entire establishment, rather than investigating claims, call Trump a liar and demand he retract and apologize.
The real story here—and it's frustrating, to say the least, that it is not emphasized—is that the actions of Attorney General Lynch, in dramatically relaxing the dissemination of raw surveillance data in the last few weeks of the Obama administration, cannot possibly have been anything but an act intended to unmask the identities of Trump et al. to the public.
Of course the media would rather commit mass suicide than investigate that crime.Read more
Here’s how I see it. There were illegally obtained intercepts of Trump communications (call them wiretaps, or intercepts, or whatever).
They show Trump did nothing wrong but they can be used to continue to push the narrative ‘Trump was involved with the Russians to hack the election’ and keep the Trump administration mired in a haze of innuendos and suspicion thereby damaging his administration.
But they have a problem.Read more
It was reported January that one of Obama's last executive orders included dissemination of NSA intelligence without restrictions of personally identifiable information? How is that not front and center in this discussion?
How can so many unambiguous statements be contrary to common sense and be refuted days or hours later and it not be concluded that EVERYONE involved is a fearless liar.Read more
Impeachment is only conducted in the Congress, along with establishing Federal Courts other than the Supreme Court, eliminating Federal Courts and determining their Jurisdiction.
So the scumbags in the GOPe who just undermined Trump with a Fascist Health Care Bill Plan and threats to deep-six his Tax Cuts would have to stop the Courts that are undermining Trump.
But it is clear that the GOPe wants to destroy Trump.Read more
Steve Pieczenak is probably concerned that the activities of the CIA could destroy it for good. The CIA:
1). Amassed a huge surveillance network without mandate or oversight
2). Collected history's biggest collection of private information in one place; and then
3). Proceeded to lose control of its tools, and thus of ALL that information
So now we know what Bill and Lynch were talking about on the tarmac. Shortly after this meeting the first FISA request, in June, to spy on Trump was denied.
In October the 2nd request was approved, which narrowed it to 2 Russian Banks and Trump Tower, which gets Comey and O involved.Read more