Special Access Program (SAP), like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is shown in this article to have compromised, was confirmed in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to Congress. Here's what I personally know about SAPs and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:
1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.Read more
IceCube wrote: "This stupidity just irritates me so much and makes my blood boil, I just hope that this evil monster EU will collapse, but by then it will most probably be too late, the cancer is already inside, breeding and spreading.
And getting rid of it will be well mmm lets just say it took Spain only 800 years to recover and get rid of this pest. So judging by history and if we use the cancer analogy I fear it will be almost impossible."
Well here's some good news. Unlike the middle ages, the West has a ridiculously superior military capability compared to the islamic hordes of 2016.Read more
Since Progressives can't convince the American people to accept their Politically Correct Looniness, they've decided to attack the problem in a different way and 'grow' a new permanent-majority of Democrats.
With the promise of generous hand-outs, our government has been luring poor immigrants here from Central America for years. How could poor people resist?
In some places, whole towns have reportedly picked-up and migrated here recently.
Blogger Hardright49 left a comment on Breitbart.com that compares our country's immigration problems with what transpired in his backyard when he tried to do something nice and feed the birds. You should read it...Read more
And Tim Allen is absolutely correct in his 1930s Germany analogy.
We've got all these Marxists running around, screaming "Nazi" and "fascist" at everyone who disagrees with them; when it is they who are inciting violence, beating people up who disagree with them; and rioting.Read more
"America’s courts only have power as long as people respect and believe and have confidence in the independence and integrity of those courts."
Are they independent? Absolutely, they regard themselves as fully independent of the United States, the Constitution and the law. Do they have integrity? Well, as much as liberal progressives ever do.Read more
Do people really have a problem with ignoring what they don't like? My god!
Who decides what is offensive? A bunch of brainwashed snowflakes or real people because snowflakes are not real people.
They are adult babies poorly brought up by apologetic parents without real life skills spewing the poor liberal apologetic education that says everyone gets a trophy.Read more
So now we know what Bill and Lynch were talking about on the tarmac. Shortly after this meeting the first FISA request, in June, to spy on Trump was denied.
In October the 2nd request was approved, which narrowed it to 2 Russian Banks and Trump Tower, which gets Comey and O involved.Read more
I used to think the problem with PP was the abortion. It isn't. There are 12 major abortion providers in the country. PP handles approximately 50% of the entire industry.
All of the other providers have reasonably spotless health records, except for PP. Notice no one talks about them.
PP has posted billion dollar profits since 2007, yet still receives 300 million in subsidies from the govt. Stopping this funding has turned into a third rail of sorts, despite the Left's disdain for "corporate welfare".Read more
I like Trump's stance, but why should taxpayers fund them (Planned Parenthood) in the first place? Is there some law that we don't know about that states that Left-Wing organizations should be supplemented by taxpayers?
Why not give that half a billion dollars a year to the 700 Club or Right-Wing organizations that do true good in the world?Read more
People have such a low opinion of the media they consider it to be only above Congress in loathsomeness.
And yet these very same media -- most of whom have been caught blatantly lying to their audiences, manipulating news to favor their political leanings, and editorializing in their "news" stories -- think they should be the arbiters of what is and is not "fake news"?Read more