Making More Laws Did Not Fix America's Problems

The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the knee jerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, child seat laws, and pet seatbelt laws.

Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine?

Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too?

Jail or not, you need to live with your conscience.

If there is no victim, there is no crime. We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10. Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Lighters? Pillows? People think crime magically goes away when something is outlawed, but there are still murders even though it’s illegal.

http://www.harrybrowne.com/GLO/DrugWar.htm

Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal?

Is outlawing cats something a free country should do?

Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of freedom?

Instead of getting mad at people who like liberty, why don’t people realize that freedom goes both ways?

If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

Who wants to live in a prison?

Think. Question everything.

.

.

This comment was left by MSL at FauquierFreeCitizen.com

.

Read the article http://fauquierfreecitizen.com/seventy-two-killed-resisting-gun-confiscation-in-boston/




Comment Category Tags